Cytochrome c: gene structure, homology and ancestral relationships

In this paper, the author notes the recommended definition of the word "homology" (i.e., indicating an ancestral relationship) and the recommended stipulation that "evidence for homology should be explicitly laid out". The postulated homology for somatic and testes-specific isozymes of cytochrome c is then examined, using recent data obtained from the study of cytochrome c genes. Consideration is also given to some newer findings of molecular biology and possibilities are considered for various types of change in the genome of an organism. Possible roles of introns, pseudogenes and multigene families are considered. The relationship of testes-specific cytochrome c to somatic cytochrome c is carefully considered from data obtained in experimental studies of genes of these two isozymes. If one assumes that these isozymes arose as a consequence of a gene duplication, data from rat and mouse genes indicate that the testes-specific isozyme has incorporated more amino acid changes than the somatic isozyme since the time of their divergence. However, when the 15 amino acid differences (testes-specific vs. somatic isozyme) are considered, there is virtually no similarity in these 15 positions of the testes-specific isozyme with any of the hypothetical ancestral sequences of the somatic isozyme. Nucleotide differences in cytochrome c genes have been evaluated by comparing genes for the two rodent cytochrome c isozymes to cytochrome c genes of fruit flies, chickens and humans. Comparisons of nucleotide substitution rates in genes for the two cytochrome c isozymes in rodents confirm the conclusions from amino acid sequence comparisons; namely, that more rapid nucleotide changes have occurred in the testes-specific cytochrome c gene, than in the somatic cytochrome c gene. Possible explanations for these findings are considered.