Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Faces retain attention.

Markus Bindemann1, A Mike Burton, Ignace T C Hooge

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland. markus@psy.gla.ac.uk

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuropsychological impairments in emotion recognition compared to general cognition: profiles across six different neurological disorders.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

The fundamentals of eye tracking, Part 7: Determining data quality.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Neural correlates of temporal interference between faces.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Longstanding mental representations of familiar faces.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Blue or gold? Visual perception and the restoration of a Medieval painting.

Perception·2026
Same author

Blink parameters are confounded by vertical eye orientation in video-based eye tracking: Comparing pupil- and eyelid-based methods.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Faces capture and hold attention more effectively than other objects. This attentional bias makes it harder to disengage processing resources from faces, impacting response times.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Attention is crucial for processing information.
  • The human brain shows a special sensitivity to faces.
  • Understanding attentional biases is key to cognitive function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if faces possess an advantage in capturing and retaining attention compared to other stimuli.
  • To investigate the impact of upright versus inverted faces on attentional allocation.
  • To examine the influence of different stimulus categories on response times.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using a go/no-go signal task.
  • Participants classified peripheral targets while focusing on central stimuli (faces, inverted faces, objects, names).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimulus onset asynchrony was varied in a replication experiment.

    • Main Results:

    • Upright faces significantly delayed target response times compared to all other categories.
    • This effect was consistent across famous and unfamiliar faces.
    • Inverted faces and objects did not produce the same attentional delay.

    Conclusions:

    • Faces exert a general attentional bias, making them difficult to disengage from.
    • This bias suggests specialized neural mechanisms for face processing.
    • The findings have implications for understanding visual attention and face perception.