Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data
Published on: April 18, 2019
Recognizing National Hockey League greatness with an ignorance-based heuristic
Brent Snook1, Richard M Cullen
1Deparment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's. bsnook@play.psych.mun.ca
Abstract:
This study examined whether people adhered to the recognition heuristic (i.e., inferred that a recognized hockey player had more total career points than an unrecognized player) and whether using this heuristic could yield accurate decisions. On paired comparisons, having participants report whether they recognized each player plus any knowledge they had about each player permitted players to be classified as either unrecognized (UR), merely recognized (MR), or recognized with additional knowledge (RK), thus producing six possible trial types. Participants adhered to the recognition heuristic on 95% of MR-UR trials and were accurate on 81% of those trials. They chose the recognized player on 98% of RK-UR trials, yielding 94% accuracy. Women had less knowledge and recognized fewer players than men, yet they were nearly as accurate as men. Future research should examine the conditions under which the recognition heuristic is an adaptive strategy.
Related Concept Videos
The Representativeness Heuristic
Hindsight Biases
The Availability Heuristic
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...

