Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Environmental planning vs. systems analysis: four prescriptive principles vs. four descriptive indicators.

Jouni Korhonen1

  • 1Research Centre Synergos, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tampere, Yliopistonkatu 54, FIN-33100 Tampere, Finland. jouni.korhonen@uta.fi

Journal of Environmental Management
|April 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study analyzes four principles for systems sustainability, identifying their limitations. These principles are then refined into practical indicators for analyzing complex systems and advancing sustainability science.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Management of old landfills by utilizing forest and energy industry waste flows.

Journal of environmental managementยท2002
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Environmental science
  • Systems theory
  • Sustainability studies

Background:

  • The application of systems thinking to sustainability challenges is increasingly recognized.
  • Existing principles for a systems approach to sustainability have been proposed with prescriptive and normative goals.
  • However, the practical utility and limitations of these principles require thorough examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the limitations of four commonly suggested principles for a systems approach to sustainability.
  • To develop these principles into descriptive indicators, metrics, or tools for practical application.
  • To enhance the study of complex systems and sustainability through refined analytical frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing principles for systems sustainability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of descriptive indicators and metrics from theoretical principles.
  • Application of these tools to the study of complex systems properties.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified limitations within the prescriptive and normative aspects of the four sustainability principles.
    • Transformation of the four principles into a set of descriptive indicators and metrics.
    • Demonstrated the utility of these indicators for analyzing complex systems.

    Conclusions:

    • The analyzed principles, while valuable, possess inherent limitations for direct application.
    • Refined principles, presented as descriptive indicators, offer a more robust framework for sustainability systems analysis.
    • The developed metrics provide practical tools for investigating critical properties of complex systems in sustainability research.