Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The propensity effect: when foresight trumps hindsight.

Neal J Roese1, Florian Fessel, Amy Summerville

  • 1University of Illinois, IL 61820, USA. roese@uiuc.edu

Psychological Science
|April 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Spontaneous Counterfactual Inference Task: Misremembering What Might Have Been.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2022
Same author

Polarized imagination: partisanship influences the direction and consequences of counterfactual thinking.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2022
Same author

The Effect of Counterfactual Potency on Behavioral Intentions.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2022
Same author

"What was meant to be" versus "what might have been": Effects of culture and control on counterfactual thinking.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2022
Same author

Effects of Choice Restriction on Accuracy and User Experience in an Internet-Based Geopolitical Forecasting Task.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Dispositional optimism weakly predicts upward, rather than downward, counterfactual thinking: A prospective correlational study using episodic recall.

PloS one·2020

Hindsight bias, the tendency to see past events as more predictable, was amplified by computer animations in mock juror decision-making. Dynamic stimuli increased this bias, impacting legal judgments.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Perceptual Psychology

Background:

  • Hindsight bias is the tendency to overestimate the predictability of past events.
  • The propensity effect, a reversal of hindsight bias, is observed in judgments with implied outcomes.
  • The impact of dynamic stimuli, like computer animations, on legal decision-making is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of computer animations on hindsight bias in mock juror decision-making.
  • To determine if dynamic stimuli uniquely elicit the propensity effect or enhance hindsight bias.
  • To explore the temporal proximity's effect on foresight judgments and outcome predictability.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged the likelihood of traffic accident outcomes presented via computer animations versus text descriptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Foresight judgments were made at varying temporal distances from the focal outcome.
  • The study compared hindsight bias levels between dynamic (animation) and static (text/diagram) stimuli.

    • Main Results:

    • Hindsight bias was significantly more than doubled when using computer animations compared to text descriptions.
    • The propensity effect, a reversal of hindsight bias, was observed only with dynamic stimuli.
    • Temporal proximity to the outcome influenced the manifestation of the propensity effect.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer animations in legal settings can substantially increase hindsight bias among jurors.
    • Dynamic stimuli, particularly animations, uniquely affect judgment biases compared to static information.
    • Findings have significant implications for the use of visual evidence in courtrooms and legal psychology.