Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Use of Human Perivascular Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration
Published on: May 25, 2012
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects
I G Needleman1, H V Worthington, E Giedrys-Leeper
1Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, Dept of Periodontology, University College London, University of London, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London, UK, WC1X 8LD. I.Needleman@eastman.ucl.ac.uk
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) offers significant improvements in periodontal treatment over open flap debridement, including better attachment gain and reduced pocket depth. However, variability in study outcomes makes overall clinical benefit uncertain.
Area of Science:
- Periodontal Medicine
- Regenerative Dentistry
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Conventional periodontal therapy halts disease progression but does not restore lost bone or connective tissue.
- Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is a surgical approach designed to regenerate periodontal tissues in advanced cases, addressing limitations of traditional methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of GTR for treating periodontal infra-bony defects compared to open flap debridement (OFD).
- To identify factors influencing treatment outcomes in GTR procedures.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, searching major databases up to April 2004.
- Included RCTs compared GTR (with or without graft materials) to OFD for periodontal infra-bony defects, with a minimum 12-month follow-up.
- Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently; meta-analysis used random-effects models.
Main Results:
- GTR demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in clinical attachment gain (1.22 mm) and probing depth reduction (1.21 mm) compared to OFD.
- GTR also showed a significant benefit in reducing the number of sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (NNT=8).
- Greater hard tissue gain at re-entry surgery was observed with GTR (1.39 mm), with increased gain when bone substitutes were used (3.37 mm).
Conclusions:
- GTR yields superior probing outcomes compared to OFD, including enhanced attachment gain and reduced pocket depth.
- Significant variability among studies and unclear clinical relevance necessitate cautious interpretation of GTR's overall benefit.
- Further research is recommended to identify factors affecting outcomes and to explore patient-centered results, with open flap surgery as the standard control.
More Related Videos
09:34Visualizing Angiogenesis by Multiphoton Microscopy In Vivo in Genetically Modified 3D-PLGA/nHAp Scaffold for Calvarial Critical Bone Defect Repair
Published on: September 7, 2017
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019