Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Biventricular vs. left univentricular pacing in heart failure: rationale, design, and endpoints of the B-LEFT HF
Christophe Leclercq1, Gerardo Ansalone, Fredrik Gadler
1Department of Cardiology, Rennes University Hospital CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri Le Guilloux, Cedex 9, 35033 Rennes, France. christophe.leclercq@chu-rennes.fr
Insights
Left ventricular (LV) pacing may be as effective as biventricular (BiV) pacing for heart failure patients. The B-LEFT HF trial compares the safety and efficacy of these cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits heart failure (HF) patients with systolic dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony.
- Biventricular (BiV) pacing is the standard CRT method, addressing electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony.
- Left ventricular (LV) only pacing shows promise as an alternative CRT strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and effectiveness of LV only pacing versus BiV pacing in heart failure patients.
- To evaluate LV pacing as a potentially simpler and less costly alternative to BiV pacing.
- The B-LEFT HF trial aims to resolve critical questions regarding LV pacing in CRT.
Main Methods:
- An international, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design clinical trial.
- 172 heart failure patients will be randomized to either LV only or BiV pacing.
- Efficacy endpoints assessed at 6 months include functional capacity, reverse remodeling, and clinical composite response.
Main Results:
- Primary endpoints: changes in functional capacity and reverse remodeling.
- Secondary endpoints: changes in heart failure clinical composite response.
- Study results will determine the non-inferiority of LV pacing compared to BiV pacing.
Conclusions:
- LV only pacing may offer similar benefits to BiV pacing with potential advantages in technical ease and cost.
- The B-LEFT HF trial is designed to provide definitive evidence on the comparative safety and effectiveness of these CRT pacing strategies.
- Findings will inform clinical practice regarding CRT in heart failure management.
Aims:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) confers sustained therapeutic benefits to patients suffering from congestive heart failure (CHF) due to systolic dysfunction associated with ventricular dyssynchrony. Biventricular (BiV) pacing has, thus far, been the preferred method, as it corrects both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. Left ventricular (LV) only pacing, which has conferred similar benefits in pilot studies, may be an alternative treatment method. 'Biventricular vs. left univentricular pacing with ICD back-up in heart failure patients' (B-LEFT HF) is an international, prospective, randomized, parallel-design, double-blind, clinical trial to examine whether LV only pacing is as safe and effective as BiV pacing in patients suffering from CHF.
Methods And Results:
The trial will randomly assign 172 patients to either LV only or BiV pacing. The study has prospectively defined efficacy endpoints to be evaluated at 6 months, which are (i) changes in functional capacity and degree of reverse remodelling (primary) and (ii) changes in the heart failure clinical composite response (secondary).
Conclusion:
Because LV only pacing in CRT is likely to be technically less challenging and costly than BiV, a specifically designed study is needed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the two configurations. B-LEFT HF has been designed to settle this critical issue.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

