Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retrospective motion correction protocol for high-resolution anatomical MRI.

Peter Kochunov1, Jack L Lancaster, David C Glahn

  • 1Research Imaging Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Human Brain Mapping
|April 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autistic Trait Dimensions and Alcohol Use in College Attending Emerging Adults.

Substance use & misuse·2026
Same author

ABCD-ReproNim: An educational program for responsible and reproducible analyses of ABCD data.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Habenula alterations in resting state functional connectivity among autistic individuals.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2026
Same author

Neurosynth Compose: A web-based platform for flexible and reproducible neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Social Determinants of Health and Pediatric Long COVID in the US.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same author

CBMR: Coordinate-based meta-regression for group and covariate inference.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

Brain Aging in Specific Phobia: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Talking to the Brain: Using Large Language Models as Proxies to Model Brain Semantic Features.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Emotional Context Modulates the Response to Somatosensory Stimuli Within 20 milliseconds.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

GABAergic Modulation of Brain Function During Prosaccade and Antisaccade Eye Movements: Evidence From Ultra-High-Field fMRI.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Injury Severity Influences Long-Term Cognitive Control in Pediatric "Mild" Traumatic Brain Injury.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Early Adulthood Signatures of Motherhood in Brain Aging.

Human brain mapping·2026
See all related articles

Retrospective motion correction (RMC) improves high-resolution 3-D MRI brain scans by reducing motion artifacts. This technique enhances image quality, offering better contrast and boundary detail for anatomical studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Medical Physics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • High-resolution anatomical MRI requires long acquisition times, increasing susceptibility to head motion.
  • Head motion degrades image quality, impacting computational brain morphology analyses.
  • Existing motion correction methods are effective for interscan motion but less so for intrascan motion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of retrospective motion correction (RMC) for improving high-resolution 3-D anatomical MRI quality.
  • To adapt RMC, typically used for fMRI and PET, for anatomical MRI acquisition.
  • To mitigate the impact of head motion in subjects at high risk.

Main Methods:

  • Dividing a single high-resolution 3-D MRI scan into six shorter segments to convert intrascan motion to interscan motion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reviewing and repeating individual segments if motion artifacts were detected to minimize intrascan motion.
  • Applying interscan motion correction by spatially registering segments and averaging them into a single motion-corrected image.

    • Main Results:

    • Retrospective motion correction (RMC) significantly improved the contrast-to-noise ratio of anatomical MRI scans.
    • RMC enhanced boundary detail in the corrected images compared to non-motion-corrected averages.
    • The method was tested on 35 subjects, demonstrating its utility in a high-risk population.

    Conclusions:

    • Retrospective motion correction is a viable method for enhancing the quality of high-resolution 3-D anatomical MRI.
    • RMC can improve image quality by increasing contrast and preserving boundary detail, crucial for morphological analyses.
    • This technique offers a solution to motion-related artifacts in MRI, particularly in challenging patient groups.