Interactions between influenza and bacterial respiratory pathogens: implications for pandemic preparedness
1Army Medical Surveillance Activity, Washington, DC 20307-5001, USA. john.brundage@amedd.army.mil
Abstract:
It is commonly believed that the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the next influenza pandemic will mimic those of the 1918 pandemic. Determinative beliefs regarding the 1918 pandemic include that infections were expressed as primary viral pneumonias and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome, that pandemic-related deaths were the end states of the natural progression of disease caused by the pandemic strain, and that bacterial superinfections caused relatively fewer deaths in 1918 than in subsequent pandemics. In turn, response plans are focused on developing and/or increasing inventories of a strain-specific vaccine, antivirals, intensive care beds, mechanical ventilators, and so on. Yet, there is strong and consistent evidence of epidemiologically and clinically important interactions between influenza and secondary bacterial respiratory pathogens, including during the 1918 pandemic. Countermeasures (eg, vaccination against pneumococcal and meningococcal disease before a pandemic; mass uses of antibiotic(s) with broad spectrums of activity against common bacterial respiratory pathogens during local epidemics) designed to prevent or mitigate the effects of influenza-bacterial interactions should be major focuses of pandemic-related research, prevention, and response planning.
Insights
Next influenza pandemic plans may be flawed. Evidence shows bacterial infections significantly interacted with influenza, even in 1918, suggesting a need to focus on these interactions in preparedness strategies.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Current influenza pandemic preparedness often assumes a repeat of the 1918 pandemic's clinical and epidemiological profile.
- This includes the belief that deaths were primarily due to viral pneumonia and that bacterial superinfections played a minor role.
Purpose of the Study:
- To challenge the prevailing assumptions about the 1918 influenza pandemic and its implications for current preparedness.
- To highlight the significant role of bacterial respiratory pathogens in influenza pandemics.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical and epidemiological evidence concerning the 1918 influenza pandemic.
- Analysis of the interactions between influenza viruses and secondary bacterial pathogens.
Main Results:
- Strong and consistent evidence indicates significant clinical and epidemiological interactions between influenza and bacterial respiratory pathogens during the 1918 pandemic.
- Bacterial superinfections were likely a major contributor to mortality, contrary to common belief.
Conclusions:
- Influenza pandemic response plans need to incorporate strategies to address influenza-bacterial interactions.
- Countermeasures such as vaccinations against bacterial pathogens and judicious antibiotic use should be prioritized in research and planning.
More Related Videos
10:47Using Bioluminescent Imaging to Investigate Synergism Between Streptococcus pneumoniae and Influenza A Virus in Infant Mice
Published on: April 14, 2011
03:53Development of Multiplex Real-Time RT-qPCR Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and MERS-CoV
Published on: November 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Influenza
Pharmacokinetics: Drug–Food and Drug–Viral Interactions
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Inhibitors Of Virion Release
Viral Recombination
Vaccinations
