Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning.

Paul K Crane1, Dennis L Hart, Laura E Gibbons

  • 1Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. pcrane@u.washington.edu

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|April 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Traumatic brain injury and late-life Alzheimer's disease neuropathology: Quantitative investigation in the Adult Changes in Thought study.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Six month repeat cognitive testing to identify people with MCI at greatest AD dementia risk.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Heterogeneous patterns of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease across three domains of cognition.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Cognitive data harmonization in the ADRC Network and beyond-Past, present, and future.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Basic Science and Pathogenesis.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Public Health.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same journal

Harms Reporting Was Frequently Incomplete or Discordant in Biomedical Randomized Trials Published in 2023: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Adjusting for differential item functioning (DIF) in shoulder function tests minimally impacts results across demographic groups. This suggests that current measures reliably assess shoulder function regardless of factors like gender or affected shoulder dominance.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Shoulder function measures can vary based on patient demographics like gender, dominance, and surgical history.
  • Identifying whether observed functional differences stem from test bias or genuine ability disparities is crucial for accurate assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and evaluate a technique for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) in shoulder function surveys.
  • To determine if adjusting for DIF in shoulder function measures alters outcomes across demographic groups.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized ordinal logistic regression (OLR) and item response theory (IRT) to analyze 37 shoulder function items for DIF in 400 patients.
  • Recalibrated item parameters separately for demographic groups when DIF was detected.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared adjusted and unadjusted patient ability measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified modest DIF in several items, particularly related to gender.
    • Adjusting for DIF had minimal impact on overall shoulder function measures.
    • Average shoulder function across demographic groups showed negligible differences after DIF adjustment.

    Conclusions:

    • In this set of shoulder function items, adjusting for DIF did not significantly alter functional measures across demographic groups.
    • The findings suggest that the analyzed shoulder function survey items are largely unbiased across the studied demographic characteristics.