Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

Jeffrey C Trost1, L David Hillis

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology Division), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. jtrost2@jhmi.edu

The American Journal of Cardiology
|April 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FFR<sub>CT</sub>: Decision-maker or innocent bystander?

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography·2024
Same author

Ultra-high-resolution CT vs. invasive angiography for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: Rationale and methods of the CORE-PRECISION multicenter study.

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography·2024
Same author

Ultra-High-Resolution Coronary CT Angiography for Assessment of Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Calcification: Initial Experience.

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging·2021
Same author

Myocardial Injury in Severe COVID-19 Compared With Non-COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Circulation·2020
Same author

Evaluation and Management of Patients With Stable Angina: Beyond the Ischemia Paradigm: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2020
Same author

Clinical Progress Notes: Updates from the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

Journal of hospital medicine·2019
Same journal

Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Octogenarian Patients With Heart Failure: Results From the PARACHUTER Study.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

ECG-Guided Conduction Pathways as a Lever to Shorten Post-TAVI Hospitalization.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Cystatin-C versus creatinine and kidney function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a SOGALDI-PEF analysis.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Balloon-expandable versus Self-expanding Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annuli Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents following Coronary Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Prehospital Statin Therapy and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) can aid critically ill cardiac patients by reducing afterload. However, its benefits must be weighed against significant risks and limited evidence in many patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) is a mechanical circulatory support device.
  • IABP aims to improve cardiac function by augmenting diastolic pressure and reducing systolic pressure.
  • Its application is considered in critically ill patients with severe cardiac conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current evidence and clinical considerations for using IABP in critically ill cardiac patients.
  • To outline the potential benefits and contraindications of IABP therapy.
  • To highlight the risks associated with IABP insertion and function.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of observational studies and clinical guidelines.
  • Analysis of IABP's hemodynamic effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Summary of patient populations where IABP is considered.

    • Main Results:

    • IABP may offer benefits in cardiogenic shock, post-myocardial infarction complications, arrhythmias, advanced heart failure, and high-risk revascularization.
    • Evidence supporting IABP use in these conditions is predominantly observational.
    • Contraindications include severe peripheral vascular disease, aortic regurgitation, dissection, or aneurysm.

    Conclusions:

    • IABP can reduce left ventricular afterload, potentially benefiting specific high-risk cardiac patient groups.
    • The evidence base for IABP is largely observational, necessitating careful consideration of risks versus benefits.
    • Potential complications include bleeding, thromboembolism, limb ischemia, and mortality, which must be weighed against therapeutic advantages.