Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Collaborative design and implementation of a multisite community coalition evaluation.

Laurie L Lachance1, Christy R Houle, Elaine F Cassidy

  • 1Allies Against Asthma, Center for Managing Chronic Disease, University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Health Promotion Practice
|April 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating Racial Identity as a Characteristics for use in Tailored Interventions Designed to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in Black/African American Adults.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2026
Same author

Redlining, Community Wealth, and Air Pollution: A Tale of Three Cities-Boston, Nashville, and Detroit.

Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2026
Same author

Three Years On: The Impact of the Dobbs Decision on Anesthesia Practice.

Anesthesiology·2025
Same author

Phenotypes of Atopic Dermatitis and Development of Allergic Diseases.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Comparison of Race-Neutral versus Race-Specific Spirometry Equations for Evaluation of Child Asthma.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2024
Same author

Virtual practice facilitation as an implementation strategy for launching opioid safety committees for quality improvement in primary care: feasibility, acceptability, and intervention fidelity.

BMC primary care·2024
Same journal

Mental Health and More: Small, Low-Wage Businesses' Workplace Wellness Needs After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same journal

Best Working Draft.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Members of <i>Health Promotion Practice</i>'s Review Panel.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of an Online Antenatal Education Program Implemented Through a Social Network.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same journal

Embedding Responsible Fatherhood Programming in Health Behavior Research: End-of-Project Results From the FELLAS Study.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same journal

Invisible in the Storm: Climate Change and the Lived Realities of Transmasculine People in India.

Health promotion practice·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluated community coalitions by examining their processes and outcomes. The Allies cross-site evaluation measured impacts at individual, organizational, and community levels using mixed methods.

Area of Science:

  • Community health research
  • Program evaluation methodologies
  • Public health interventions

Background:

  • Assessing community coalitions requires balancing process measures with outcome evidence.
  • The Allies cross-site evaluation addresses this need by examining seven coalitions' collective impact.
  • Effective evaluation must consider multiple levels of influence and diverse data types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the combined effects of seven community coalitions' work.
  • To assess impacts at individual, organizational, and community levels.
  • To integrate evaluation into coalition planning and implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data.
  • Considered principal components including contextual factors, coalition processes, planning, implementation, activities, and outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasized partner involvement throughout the evaluation design and decision-making process.

    • Main Results:

    • The evaluation framework systematically assessed coalition functioning and impact.
    • Data collection captured a comprehensive view of coalition activities and their anticipated outcomes.
    • Mixed-methods data provided both standalone insights and corroboration for other findings.

    Conclusions:

    • A balanced evaluation design is crucial for understanding coalition effectiveness.
    • The Allies evaluation provides a model for assessing multi-level community intervention impacts.
    • Integrating evaluation ensures alignment with coalition goals and partner engagement.