Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence-based medicine and tort law.

Elliott Foucar1, Mark R Wick

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
|April 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Squamoid Eccrine Ductal Carcinoma of the Eyelid: Clinicopathologic Correlation of a Case.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2022
Same author

The Role of Cue-Based Strategies in Skilled Diagnosis Among Pathologists.

Human factors·2021
Same author

PRAME immunohistochemistry as an adjunct for diagnosis and histological margin assessment in lentigo maligna.

Histopathology·2020
Same author

Glioma-Associated Oncogene-1 Expression in Basal Cell Carcinoma and Its Histologic Mimics.

The American Journal of dermatopathology·2020
Same author

Corrigendum to "Proliferative, reparative, and reactive benign bone lesions that may be confused diagnostically with true osseous neoplasm" Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology 31 (2014) 66-88.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2020
Same author

Inflammatory lobular hemangioma: A vascular proliferation with a prominent lymphoid component. Review of a series of 19 cases.

Journal of cutaneous pathology·2020
Same journal

Update on the molecular pathology of the distinctive giant cell, fibro-osseous and bone forming lesions of the jaws.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2026
Same journal

Update on the molecular pathology and classification of odontogenic cysts and tumours.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2026
Same journal

MDM2 gene amplification in surgical pathology: biology, diagnostic utility, and clinical relevance in the modern era.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2026
Same journal

When three negatives equal a positive: Molecular updates of triple-negative breast carcinomas with favorable prognoses.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2026
Same journal

Old school, new insight: Revisiting histomorphology in the modern era of prostate cancer risk stratification.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2026
Same journal

Recent advances in genetic predisposition to primary testicular tumors.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology·2026
See all related articles

The legal system struggles to implement evidence-based medicine principles for expert testimony in tort law. Reconciling legal procedures with scientific rigor remains a significant challenge for fair decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Legal Medicine
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Tort Law

Background:

  • Efforts to improve tort law decisions focus on enhancing expert testimony quality.
  • The legal system faces challenges in applying scientific rigor, unlike evidence-based medicine in healthcare.
  • Traditional legal procedures often conflict with strict scientific standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the American tort system from an evidence-based perspective.
  • To identify standards for outcomes analysis in law.
  • To explore impediments to evidence-based decision-making in legal contexts involving complex science.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and analysis of legal statutes and decisions.
  • Examination of the relationship between medical errors, negligence, and standard of care.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of challenges in reconciling plaintiff rights with medical-scientific facts.

    • Main Results:

    • Describing ideal science is easier than actualizing it within the legal framework.
    • The legal system's traditional lack of scientific discernment and procedural priorities hinder evidence-based application.
    • Specific impediments include court errors and difficulties with pathologic interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Achieving consistent, evidence-based decisions in tort law requires addressing systemic incompatibilities with scientific standards.
    • Developing legal standards for outcomes analysis and recognizing court errors are crucial steps.
    • Reconciling legal rights with scientific facts, especially in complex cases, remains a key challenge.