Related Experiment Videos
Flow meter urine testing: a practical proposition in patients attending for urodynamics?
1Bristol Urological Institute, Urology, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK. hashim@doctors.org.uk
BJU International
|April 29, 2006
Summary
A simple urine dipstick test on a free-flow urine sample can effectively detect urinary tract infections (UTIs) before urodynamic testing, preventing unnecessary catheterization and potential complications.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a known complication following urodynamic testing.
- Current guidelines lack standardized protocols for pre-urodynamic urine analysis.
- Preventing UTIs is crucial to mitigate risks associated with invasive procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a practical, non-invasive method for detecting UTIs prior to urodynamic investigations.
- To evaluate the efficacy of pre-urodynamic urine dipstick testing.
Main Methods:
- Patients provided a free-flow urine sample analyzed via dipstick before urodynamics.
- Urine dipstick analysis was also performed on a catheter-obtained urine specimen (CSU) for comparison.
- Flowmeters were meticulously cleaned between patients to prevent cross-contamination.
Main Results:
- Nitrite detection in free-flow samples showed 100% concordance with catheter specimens.
- Leukocyte detection was consistent in 89% of paired samples.
- Discrepancies in leukocyte results (11% of cases, predominantly in women) were attributed to vaginal contamination.
Conclusions:
- Pre-urodynamic urine dipstick testing of free-flow samples is a feasible and effective screening method.
- This approach avoids unnecessary catheterization, reducing the risk of bacteraemia.
- It allows for essential flowrate measurements to be performed safely.