Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Subcutaneous Administration of Muscarinic Antagonists and Triple-Immunostaining of the Levator Auris Longus Muscle in Mice
Published on: September 8, 2011
[Interaction between mivacurium and succinylcholine from a different point of view]
1Doctor en Ciencias Médicas, Departamento de Anestesia, Hospital de Clínicas Caracas, Policlínica Méndez Gimón, Caracas, Venezuela. steinberg@telcel.net.ve
Objectives:
Succinylcholine (SCH) may first be used and continue with mivacurium (MIV). MIV has been suggested as a pretreatment. Conflicting results arises from studies on SCH-MIV interaction. The following trial revisits this interaction.
Patients And Methods:
The patients were intubated after randomized administration of 100 microg x Kg(-1) of mivacurium (group 1) or 1 mg x Kg(-1) of succinylcholine and, after 50% recovery, 100 microg x Kg(-1) of mivacurium (group 2). A third group received the same regimen as group 2, preceded by pretreatment with 10 microg x Kg(-1) of mivacurium. Maximum effect (MAX), onset time, the 10%-25% recovery index, and duration of effect of mivacurium were determined by electromyography. In groups 2 and 3, the corrected MAX was defined as the difference between the actual MAX effect and the residual block after administration of succinylcholine, and speed of action was defined as the ratio between MAX or corrected MAX and onset time. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls and t tests for bivariate comparisons. A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
Groups 2 and 3 had significantly greater MAX effects (97% and 98%, respectively) in comparison with group 1 (93%), shorter onset times (135 and 158 seconds in groups 2 and 3 vs 279 seconds in group 1), and greater speed of action without changes in duration of effect. MAX was halved when corrected (to 47% and 49% in groups 2 and 3, respectively), and speed of action was significantly reduced (from 1.34 and 1.62 seconds/% in groups 2 and 3 respectively, to 2.69 and 3.36 seconds/%). Mivacurium pretreatment did not produce relevant clinical changes.
Conclusions:
When mivacurium is used before the effects of succinylcholine disappear, a residual effect is not usually taken into consideration. This study corrected MAX and calculated speed of action, demonstrating a reduction in net block and speed of action, consistent with an antagonistic action when the 2 blockers are administered sequentially.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Skeletal Muscles
When an action potential...

