Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Understanding self-evaluations of effectiveness by forestry advisory committee members: a case of Ontario's Local
Len M Hunt1, Bonita L McFarlane
1Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada P7B 5E1. len.hunt@mnr.gov.on.ca
Abstract:
Researchers have devised many criteria that could assist with the development of an effective public participation process. Few studies, however, have linked these criteria to the effectiveness of decision-making resulting from these processes. We assess whether several criteria postulated by others for designing an effective decision-making process are associated with evaluations of the effectiveness of decision-making by advisory group members from a forest management planning process in Ontario, Canada. Data were collected by written questionnaires from 197 advisory group members in 2001. Four criteria were linked to the effectiveness evaluations including process control (influence), trust in decision-makers, information credibility, and process efficiency. The criterion of knowledge along with contextual variables related to experience, economic dependence on forestry, and geographical residence were not associated with evaluations of effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison