Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Naming, blaming and shaming?

M Bismark1, R Paterson

  • 1Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

Medicine and Law
|May 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Doctors facing complaints often seek name suppression due to reputational risks. New Zealand

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Practice Guidelines in Surgical Malpractice Litigation: An Analysis of California Trial Court Orders.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same author

Generalised absence seizures in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels presenting with paroxysms: eight cases (2016-2025).

The Journal of small animal practice·2026
Same author

Signalment, clinical characteristics and outcomes of an Australian population of dogs with steroid responsive meningitis-arteritis (SRMA) - 124 cases (2013-2023).

Australian veterinary journal·2024
Same author

Culture, conditions and care support mental health of healthcare workers during crises.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Sociodemographic characteristics associated with a higher wish to complain about health care.

Public health·2022
Same author

Physical health trajectories of young people commenced on clozapine.

Irish journal of psychological medicine·2020
Same journal

CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

Medicine and law·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Healthcare Regulation
  • Professional Ethics

Background:

  • Doctors facing complaints or disciplinary proceedings often desire anonymity to protect their reputation, patients, and families.
  • Balancing the doctor's privacy against the public's interest in transparency is crucial in these cases.
  • The Health and Disability Commissioner in New Zealand investigates complaints regarding medical care quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the practice of name suppression for doctors involved in complaints and disciplinary proceedings in New Zealand.
  • To analyze the balance between doctors' privacy and public interest in transparency within the medical regulatory system.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the Health and Disability Commissioner's current practices regarding the naming of doctors under investigation or found to have breached patient rights.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the legal and ethical considerations in granting name suppression versus public disclosure.
  • Examination of the rehabilitative focus of New Zealand's medical regulatory system.

    • Main Results:

    • The Health and Disability Commissioner typically does not publicly name doctors under investigation or those found to have breached patient rights.
    • This practice aligns with New Zealand's non-punitive, rehabilitative approach to medical regulation.
    • Disclosure is favored only in rare cases meeting the threshold for disciplinary action.

    Conclusions:

    • New Zealand's approach prioritizes rehabilitation, often opting for name suppression for doctors in complaints processes.
    • The balance shifts towards disclosure when serious disciplinary action is warranted.
    • This policy reflects a nuanced approach to professional accountability and public interest in healthcare.