Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia--he illusion of autonomy.

O J Hartling1

  • 1The Danish Council of Ethics, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Medicine and Law
|May 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper examines ethical arguments for voluntary euthanasia, questioning patient autonomy and the rationality of ending life to relieve suffering. It highlights potential pressures and the unreliability of decisions made under duress.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms.

Journal of medical ethics·2009
Same author

Anonymity in connection with sperm donation.

Medicine and law·2007
Same author

Human rights violations in Burma/Myanmar. A two year follow-up examination.

Danish medical bulletin·2001
Same author

Uptake index and stimulated salivary gland response in 99Tcm-pertechnetate salivary gland scintigraphy in normal subjects.

Nuclear medicine communications·1997
Same author

[It should be obvious to everyone].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1996
Same author

[Quality assurance].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1995
Same journal

CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

Medicine and law·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine
  • Legal Philosophy

Background:

  • Voluntary euthanasia is a contentious issue with common arguments supporting its legalization.
  • Ethical and philosophical considerations are crucial in evaluating these arguments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the ethical and philosophical underpinnings of arguments for voluntary euthanasia.
  • To challenge the notion of autonomous decision-making in the context of euthanasia.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of ethical arguments.
  • Ethical reasoning and conceptual clarification.
  • Examination of autonomy and decision-making capacity.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The argument for euthanasia based on autonomy is questioned due to potential indirect pressures on patients.
  • The rationality of ending life to alleviate suffering is challenged.
  • Decision-making capacity for euthanasia can be compromised by despair, hopelessness, and feelings of being a burden.

    • Conclusions:

    • Arguments supporting voluntary euthanasia require deeper ethical scrutiny.
    • The concept of autonomous choice in euthanasia is problematic due to potential coercion and compromised decision-making capacity.
    • Societal and familial pressures can influence a patient's decision, complicating the notion of a free choice.