Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Benefit and benefit assessment].

J Windeler1

  • 1Medizinischer Dienst der Spitzenverbände der Krankenkassen (MDS), 45141 Essen.

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)
|May 12, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Benefit assessment of medical devices].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2015
Same author

["IGeL" or not: cancer screening always needs comprehensive information].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2014
Same author

[Epidemiological methods for health services research].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2009
Same author

[Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2009
Same author

[Comment on: Evidence and medical decision-making--what kind of evidence do we really need? in Versicherungsmedizin 59 (2007) Heft 4 S. 166]].

Versicherungsmedizin·2008
Same author

[Methodological basis for evidence-based medicine].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2008
Same journal

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

["Not everything that looks like a tumor..." - Pulmonary tularemia with hilar lymphadenopathy].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

[Emergency management of sickle cell disease].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

[Hereditary dehydrated stomatocytosis (= hereditary xerocytosis) - Interesting hummingbird or clinically relevant diagnosis?]

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

[Diagnosis of Congenital Hemolytic Anemias in Adults].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

[46-year-old female patient with right upper abdominal pain].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
See all related articles

The value of medical interventions focuses on patient benefit, improving prognosis, symptoms, or quality of life. Patient-relevant outcomes are key to assessing intervention value and ensuring quality medical care.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Health economics
  • Patient-centered outcomes

Context:

  • Defining and assessing the 'value' of medical interventions is crucial for informed patient decision-making.
  • Current assessments often lack a clear focus on patient-perceived benefits and relevant endpoints.
  • Ensuring that medical interventions provide tangible improvements beyond minimal effect is a primary concern.

Purpose:

  • To establish a clear definition of 'value' in medical interventions, centered on patient benefit.
  • To emphasize the importance of patient-relevant endpoints in the assessment of medical interventions.
  • To guide the development of a framework for evaluating the true value of healthcare treatments.

Summary:

  • Value in medicine is defined by the positive effects of an intervention on patient prognosis, symptoms, or quality of life.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The assessment must prioritize patient benefit, using clinically and patient-relevant endpoints that signify meaningful changes.
  • Effective communication of value requires that patients are adequately informed about potential outcomes.

    • Impact:

    • Promotes a patient-centric approach to healthcare evaluation and decision-making.
    • Enhances the quality of individual treatments and medical practice by focusing on meaningful outcomes.
    • Aims to ensure that medical interventions deliver demonstrable and relevant benefits to patients.