Junior doctors and the full shift rota--psychological and hormonal changes: a comparative cross-sectional study
A M Smith1, P Morris, K O Rowell
1Department of Cardiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.
Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|May 13, 2006
Summary
New European Working Time Directive shift patterns impact junior doctors. Studies show hormonal changes and increased psychological distress, indicating ongoing physiological consequences for medical professionals.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Endocrinology
- Psychology
Background:
- The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) aimed to regulate working hours for junior doctors.
- Concerns remain regarding the physiological and psychological effects of shift work patterns implemented under the EWTD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hormonal (cortisol, testosterone) and psychological effects of full shift rotas on male junior doctors.
- To assess the impact of post-holiday, normal working week, and night shifts on doctor well-being.
Main Methods:
- A comparative, cross-sectional study design was employed.
- Hormonal levels (cortisol, testosterone) and questionnaire data (GHQ-12, ADAM) were collected from male junior doctors in South Yorkshire.
- Data were gathered at baseline (post-holiday), after a normal working week, and after a week of nights.
Main Results:
- Cortisol levels significantly decreased after a normal working week and night shifts compared to baseline.
- General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) scores, indicating psychological distress, significantly increased after both normal working weeks and night shifts.
- Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire data also indicated potential impacts, though not detailed in the abstract summary.
Conclusions:
- Despite the EWTD, implemented shift work patterns continue to have significant physiological and psychological consequences for junior doctors.
- Further research and potential adjustments to working patterns are warranted to mitigate these adverse effects on medical professionals' health.
Related Concept Videos
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
02:12Relationship Formation
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
01:08Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
01:40Hormonal Regulation
Hormones regulate a significant portion of digestion through activation of the neuroendocrine system. The neuroendocrine system of digestion contains many different hormones all with multiple functions that are both, directly and indirectly, involved in digestion.