Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anesthesia considerations for vitreoretinal surgery.

Steve Charles1, Gary L Fanning

  • 1University of Tennessee, College of Medicine, 6401 Poplar Avenue, Suite 190, Charles Retina Institute, Memphis, TN 38119, USA. scharles@att.net

Ophthalmology Clinics of North America
|May 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Re: Vangipuram et al.: Timing of delayed retinal pathology in patients presenting with acute posterior vitreous detachment in the IRIS registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). (Ophthalmol Retina. 2023:7:713-720).

Ophthalmology. Retina·2024
Same author

Surgical Management of Full-Thickness Macular Holes in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: A Global Multicenter Study.

Ophthalmology·2023
Same author

Feasibility and Potential for Real-Time 3D Vitreoretinal Surgery Telementoring.

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2023
Same author

FLUIDIC PERFORMANCE OF A DUAL-ACTION VITRECTOMY PROBE COMPARED WITH A SINGLE-ACTION PROBE.

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2022
Same author

Autologous Retinal Transplantation for Primary and Refractory Macular Holes and Macular Hole Retinal Detachments: The Global Consortium.

Ophthalmology·2020
Same author

Clinical comparison of 27-gauge and 23-gauge instruments on the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy surgery for the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2020
Same journal

Contrast sensitivity and measuring cataract outcomes.

Ophthalmology clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Capsular tension rings: update on endocapsular support devices.

Ophthalmology clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Management of vitreous loss and dropped nucleus during cataract surgery.

Ophthalmology clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Astigmatism control.

Ophthalmology clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

New technology IOL optics.

Ophthalmology clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Phaco fluidics and phaco ultrasound power modulations.

Ophthalmology clinics of North America·2006
See all related articles

Local anesthesia with minimal sedation is safe and effective for most vitreoretinal procedures, offering better patient safety and faster recovery than general anesthesia. Patient needs and surgeon requirements guide the best anesthesia choice for optimal visual outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Anesthesiology

Background:

  • Vitreoretinal procedures are complex surgeries.
  • Anesthesia choice impacts patient safety and recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia for vitreoretinal procedures.
  • To compare local anesthesia with general anesthesia in this context.

Main Methods:

  • Review of anesthetic techniques for vitreoretinal surgery.
  • Comparison of outcomes under local versus general anesthesia.

Main Results:

  • Most vitreoretinal surgeries can be safely performed under local anesthesia with minimal sedation.
  • Local anesthesia provides increased safety, reduced recovery times, and better pain relief compared to general anesthesia.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Monitored local anesthesia is a safe and effective option for the majority of vitreoretinal procedures.
  • Anesthesia selection should prioritize patient well-being and surgical requirements for optimal visual results.