Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.

Rob H J van der Lubbe1, Maarten M Havik, Evelijne M Bekker

  • 1Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. R.H.J.vanderLubbe@gw.utwente.nl

Psychophysiology
|May 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Introducing the Bbrainklok as a Digital External Memory Aid on Prospective Memory, Apathy and Autonomy in Individuals with Korsakoff's Syndrome.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment·2026
Same author

Wayfinding with Impaired Vision: Preferences for Cues, Strategies, and Aids (Part II-Perspectives from Orientation and Mobility Instructors).

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Wayfinding with Impaired Vision: Preferences for Cues, Strategies, and Aids (Part I-Perspectives from Visually Impaired Individuals).

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

The Ventral Attention Network Mediates Attentional Reorienting to Cross-Modal Expectancy Violations: Evidence from EEG and fMRI.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Smartwatch reminders can support time-based prospective memory in patients with Korsakoff's syndrome.

Neuropsychological rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Apathy in Korsakoff Syndrome: A Call for Clinical Awareness in Long-Term Care Settings.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2025
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Exogenous cuing effects differ between detection and discrimination tasks. Findings suggest visual cues trigger rapid motor inhibition in unimodal detection tasks, influencing reaction times.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human attention

Background:

  • Exogenous cuing influences reaction time (RT) in detection and discrimination tasks.
  • Previous research suggests delayed attention withdrawal or cue-induced inhibition.
  • Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying these task-dependent effects is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of task-dependent exogenous cuing effects on RT.
  • To differentiate between attention withdrawal and response inhibition mechanisms.
  • To examine unimodal and crossmodal versions of the Posner paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Posner paradigm with unimodal and crossmodal visual stimuli.
  • Employed both detection and discrimination tasks with short cue-target intervals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured event-related potentials, specifically the P1 component and lateralized readiness potential (LRP).

    • Main Results:

    • Task-dependent cuing effects on RT were observed in the unimodal, but not crossmodal, condition.
    • No significant cuing effects were found for the P1 component.
    • LRP data indicated a premotoric locus for inhibition of return in the unimodal detection task.

    Conclusions:

    • Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects on RT are modulated by modality.
    • Inhibition of return in unimodal detection tasks likely involves rapid, cue-triggered motor inhibition.
    • Findings support a premotoric explanation for inhibition in specific visual attention tasks.