Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

J Dixon1, H G Welch

  • 1Commonwealth Fund, New York, NY 10021-2692.

Lancet (London, England)
|April 13, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Opportunities for health system strengthening to reduce preventable trauma deaths in the Western Cape Province, South Africa: Findings from an expert panel review.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2026
Same author

Dedicated anticoagulation management protocols in fragility femoral fracture care - a source of significant variance and limited effectiveness in improving time to surgery: The hip and femoral fracture anticoagulation surgical timing evaluation (HASTE) study.

Injury·2024
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Radiotherapy Quality Assurance in the PORTEC-3 (TROG 08.04) Trial.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2021
Same author

Profunda femoris mycotic aneurysm as a complication of bacterial endocarditis: a case report and review of the literature.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2021
Same journal

Medical compartmentalisation: a patient with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in Japan.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (COMPETE): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Research priorities for characterising Bundibugyo virus.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Rethinking treatment sequence in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Dual mobility total hip replacement in fractures: stability promotes patient confidence.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Dual mobility versus standard cups in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures (Duality): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Oregon created a unique health service priority-setting method using cost-utility analysis and public values. This approach ranked 714 treatments, offering insights for resource allocation in healthcare management.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Limited healthcare resources necessitate effective priority-setting mechanisms.
  • Oregon pioneered a novel approach to health service prioritization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe Oregon's unique health service priority-setting method.
  • To analyze the incorporation of cost-utility analysis and public values.
  • To examine the implications for healthcare resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a cost-utility formula integrated with public attitudes and values.
  • Application of an explicit process by the Oregon Health Services Commission.
  • Ranking of 714 specific condition-treatment pairs.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public HealthMedicaidNational Health ServiceOregon Health DecisionsOregon Health Services Commission

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive ranking of 714 condition-treatment pairs was established.
  • The methodology provides a transparent framework for resource allocation decisions.
  • The approach highlights critical considerations for healthcare managers and physicians.

Conclusions:

  • Oregon's model offers a unique framework for health service prioritization.
  • The integration of cost-utility and public values presents a novel approach.
  • This methodology raises important questions for resource allocation in other health systems.