Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic reviews in midwifery.

Edwin van Teijlingen1, Moira Napper, Julie Bruce

  • 1Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen.

RCM Midwives : the Official Journal of the Royal College of Midwives
|June 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strengthening natural hazard preparedness in Nepal: insights from stakeholder and community engagement.

Global health action·2026
Same author

Remote Multicomponent Rehabilitation in Intensive Care Unit Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Ankle Fracture FIXation surgery with or without Tourniquet (AFFIXT): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Understanding the formulation of non-communicable disease policies in Nepal: a qualitative study.

Health policy and planning·2026
Same author

Stigma in UK health care: a key barrier to reaching zero HIV transmission by 2030.

HIV research & clinical practice·2026
Same author

Prenatal substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: associations with depression, anxiety, and pandemic stressors.

Frontiers in public health·2026

This guide outlines essential steps for conducting systematic reviews, emphasizing a transparent approach for healthcare practitioners. It acknowledges time constraints while promoting rigorous literature review methodologies.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Healthcare practitioners often face time and resource limitations when conducting literature reviews.
  • A systematic and transparent approach is crucial for reliable evidence synthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the key steps involved in conducting a systematic review.
  • To provide guidance for healthcare practitioners undertaking literature reviews.

Main Methods:

  • The paper outlines a systematic process for conducting literature reviews.
  • References are provided for further detailed guidance on systematic reviews.

Main Results:

  • Key steps for systematic review conduct are identified.
  • Resources for enhanced systematic review methodology are signposted.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Adopting a systematic and transparent approach is vital for healthcare literature reviews.
  • Utilizing available detailed guidance can improve the quality of systematic reviews.