Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy

Heidi Anttila1, Antti Malmivaara, Regina Kunz

  • 1Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland. heidi.anttila@stakes.fi

Pediatrics
|June 3, 2006
PubMed

Insights

Reporting quality in physiotherapy trials for children with cerebral palsy is poor. Adhering to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines is crucial for accurate clinical implications.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Trial Methodology

Background:

  • Assessing physiotherapy interventions for pediatric cerebral palsy is hindered by inconsistent trial reporting.
  • The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement offers guidelines for improving trial transparency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physiotherapy for children with cerebral palsy.
  • To assess adherence to CONSORT statement recommendations in this specific research area.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search for RCTs on physiotherapy for pediatric cerebral palsy published since 1990.
  • Evaluation of 15 identified RCTs using a modified 33-item CONSORT checklist by two independent reviewers.

Main Results:

  • Only 48% of applicable CONSORT items were adequately reported across the 15 RCTs.
  • Key areas of inadequate reporting included outcome measures, sample size, randomization details, blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis.

Conclusions:

  • A significant number of RCTs in pediatric cerebral palsy physiotherapy suffer from poor reporting.
  • High-quality reporting is feasible, as most items have been described in at least one study.
  • Improved adherence to CONSORT guidelines is essential for reliable clinical decision-making.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos