Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--impact of training and supervision

To define the influence of training and supervision on the quality of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy we compared our perioperative parameters, as well as the postoperative functional and oncological outcomes of four generations of surgeons with significantly different training modalities. The first two generations were trained in open retropubic radical prostatectomy, but the third and fourth generation were trained mostly laparoscopically. Overall the data of more than 1000 performed cases were compared: We could not find any significant difference concerning our complication rates. Also the data of oncological (positive margins) and functional results (data of continence with a follow-up of more than two years) were comparable within all groups. A learning curve was observed only for the operating time, but proved to be significantly shorter for the third and fourth generations. Therefore we can conclude that the quality of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on the individual experience in open surgery but to a considerable extent on the quality of laparoscopic education (e.g. simulation trainer, supervision).