Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating selection pressures from limited comparative data.

Joshua B Plotkin, Jonathan Dushoff, Michael M Desai

    Molecular Biology and Evolution
    |June 7, 2006
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cooperation conflicts with equality when allocating public goods.

    Nature·2026
    Same author

    Epistasis and background dependence in the evolution of Omicron variants of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    Same author

    Serial Interval and Intervention Efficiency in Pertussis Outbreak, South Korea, 2024.

    Emerging infectious diseases·2026
    Same author

    Adaptive loss of function accelerated the evolution of ancient and modern human cognition.

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
    Same author

    The evolution of trust under institutional moral hazard.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
    Same author

    Sex decreases the pleiotropic costs of local adaptation by purging hitchhiking load.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    Same journal

    seqLens: optimizing language models for genomic predictions.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    Same journal

    The transcriptional and translational outcomes for pseudogenes in bacterial endosymbionts.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    Same journal

    800 million years of co-evolution in the green plant lineage - the case of LEUNIG and SEUSS transcriptional co-regulators.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    Same journal

    RNA i-motif landscapes in plant kingdom and their potential functional roles.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    Same journal

    Functional Divergence and Structural Changes of class IV Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) Across the Tree of Life.

    Molecular biology and evolution·2026
    See all related articles

    We developed a new regression method to estimate protein selection pressures using limited comparative genomic data. This approach is more powerful and broadly applicable than previous single-genome methods.

    Area of Science:

    • Evolutionary biology
    • Genomics
    • Molecular evolution

    Background:

    • Estimating protein selection pressures is crucial for understanding evolution.
    • Previous methods like "volatility" have limitations, including reliance on single genomes or misconceptions.
    • Comparative methods often require extensive data and specific population-genetic assumptions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel, more powerful, and widely applicable method for genome-wide selection pressure estimation.
    • To address limitations of existing methods by developing a technique based on limited comparative data.
    • To provide a robust approach independent of specific population-genetic models.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a simple regression technique for selection pressure estimation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing limited comparative genomic data.
  • The method is independent of underlying population-genetic mechanisms.

    • Main Results:

    • The new regression technique provides a robust way to estimate selection pressures across an entire genome.
    • This method overcomes some criticisms of previous approaches, such as "volatility".
    • The approach is more powerful and broadly applicable than the "volatility" method.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel regression technique offers a significant advancement in estimating genome-wide protein selection pressures.
    • This method provides a more versatile and powerful tool for evolutionary and genomic studies.
    • The approach is suitable for a wider range of biological systems due to its independence from specific population-genetic models.