Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypermnesia and total retrieval time.

Neil W Mulligan1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA. nmulligan@unc.edu

Memory (Hove, England)
|June 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research on "the testing effect" routinely conflates direct and forward testing effects: A meta-analysis of testing effects with free recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Why does experimental design moderate the effect of judgment of learning (JOL) reactivity?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Putting Emotional Memories in Context: The Constructionist Model of Emotional Memory.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Four (and a Half) Preregistered Failures to Replicate the Weapon Focus Effect in Online Samples.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2025
Same author

Does processing level at retrieval moderate the testing effect? Evidence of an asymmetry between study-based encoding and retrieval-based encoding.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Attention and the forward testing effect.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Repeated recall attempts can improve memory recall, a process called hypermnesia. This study found that spaced recall tests, not just longer tests, significantly enhance memory retrieval performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Recall performance can improve with repeated testing, a phenomenon known as hypermnesia.
  • A key debate in memory research concerns whether hypermnesia results from repeated testing itself or extended retrieval time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the theoretical issue of whether hypermnesia is caused by repeated testing or increased retrieval time.
  • To compare the effects of different testing schedules on memory recall and hypermnesia.

Main Methods:

  • Five distinct testing conditions were employed, all using the same initial study list.
  • Conditions included multiple shorter tests (split by a 7-minute delay or immediate) and single longer tests (at the start, after a delay, or with an interruption).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants' recall performance was measured across these varied testing paradigms.

    • Main Results:

    • The multiple-split condition, with tests separated by a delay, yielded greater reminiscence and hypermnesia compared to the multiple-immediate condition.
    • Crucially, the multiple-split condition resulted in superior cumulative recall over all other tested conditions.
    • Testing conditions of equal total duration were found to be not functionally equivalent in terms of recall outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • The timing and spacing of recall tests significantly impact memory retrieval.
    • Repeated, spaced recall attempts are more effective for enhancing memory than single, extended tests or immediate repeated tests.
    • These findings challenge the notion that total testing duration is the sole determinant of memory improvement through testing.