Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Whole-body PET/MRI of Pediatric Patients: The Details That Matter
Published on: December 19, 2017
Media reporting on research presented at scientific meetings: more caution needed
Steven Woloshin1, Lisa M Schwartz
1VA Outcomes Group, Dartmouth Medical School, White River Junction, VT, USA. lisa.schwartz@dartmouth.edu
Media coverage of scientific research often omits key study details and limitations. This can mislead the public about the validity and relevance of new scientific findings.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research Communication
- Science Journalism
- Public Understanding of Science
Background:
- Media reporting on scientific meetings is common.
- Accurate reporting requires inclusion of study facts and limitations.
- Previous studies suggest media coverage may lack essential details.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate media coverage of research presented at scientific meetings.
- To assess if reports included basic study facts and cautions.
- To determine if media clarity existed regarding the preliminary nature of research.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 187 media stories (newspaper, TV, radio) reporting on five major scientific meetings (2002-2003).
- Physicians trained in clinical epidemiology assessed reporting of study size, design, quantified results, and limitations.
- Evaluation of mentions of study cautions (e.g., animal studies, small sample sizes, uncontrolled designs) and preliminary findings.
Main Results:
- A significant portion of stories omitted study size (34%) or design (18%).
- 40% of stories failed to quantify main results.
- Reporting on study limitations was poor: only 6% of animal study reports mentioned relevance to humans, and few reports on small or uncontrolled studies noted precision or confounding issues.
- Few intervention study reports (29%) mentioned potential downsides.
Conclusions:
- Media stories frequently lack essential study facts and cautionary information.
- Incomplete reporting can lead to public misunderstanding of scientific validity and relevance.
- Improved science journalism practices are needed to accurately convey research findings.
More Related Videos
09:53Labeling of Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenografts with Traceable Reporters for Tumor Growth and Metastasis Studies
Published on: November 30, 2016
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Reporter Genes
Commonly used reporter...
The Scientific Method
Synthetic Biology
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...