Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
13:35
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
Validity of a new automated software program for visceral adipose tissue estimation
E W Demerath1, K J Ritter, W A Couch
1Department of Community Health, Lifespan Health Research Center, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA. ellen.demerath@wright.edu
International Journal of Obesity (2005)
|June 14, 2006
Summary
Hippo Fat software rapidly quantifies visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) from MRI scans. However, its measurements are not interchangeable with the slice-O-matic method for group or individual analysis.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical imaging analysis
- Medical software validation
- Adipose tissue quantification
Background:
- Automated biomedical image analysis is crucial for efficient adipose tissue volume quantification, reducing time and research costs.
- Hippo Fat is a novel software for automatic adipose tissue area measurement from MRI, requiring no user input.
- Independent validation of Hippo Fat against established software is necessary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) estimates from Hippo Fat with slice-O-matic, a validated manual method.
- To assess Hippo Fat's suitability for large-scale studies.
- To validate the accuracy and utility of automated adipose tissue measurement software.
Main Methods:
- Abdominal MRI scans (T1-weighted) were acquired from 40 healthy adults (20 men, age 18-77, BMI 19-43 kg/m²).
- Adipose tissue volumes were quantified using both Hippo Fat and slice-O-matic (version 4.2).
- Statistical correlation and comparison of VAT and SAT estimates were performed.
Main Results:
- Hippo Fat showed high correlation (R² > 0.9) with slice-O-matic for both VAT and SAT estimates.
- Average VAT was 9.4% lower and average SAT was 3.7% higher with Hippo Fat compared to slice-O-matic.
- Individual VAT differences were substantial, with estimates varying significantly between methods.
Conclusions:
- Hippo Fat offers a fast method for quantifying total VAT from MRI.
- The software's estimates are not interchangeable with slice-O-matic at the group or individual level.
- Further validation is needed before widespread adoption in large-scale studies.