Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MR colonography: current status.

Thomas C Lauenstein1

  • 1Department of Radiology, The Emory Clinic, 1365 Clifton Road, Building A, Suite AT-627, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. tlauens@emory.edu

European Radiology
|June 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research in abdominal imaging - current status and trends at ECR 2020.

European radiology·2020
Same author

1.5 versus 3 versus 7 Tesla in abdominal MRI: A comparative study.

PloS one·2017
Same author

18 F-FDG PET/MR imaging in patients with suspected liver lesions: Value of liver-specific contrast agent Gadobenate dimeglumine.

PloS one·2017
Same author

Contrast enhanced renal MR angiography at 7 Tesla: How much gadolinium do we need?

European journal of radiology·2016
Same author

Hybrid imaging of the bowel using PET/MR enterography: Feasibility and first results.

European journal of radiology·2016
Same author

Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel at 7 Tesla in comparison to 1.5 Tesla: First steps towards clinical application.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2016
Same journal

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

STIR or T2-Dixon? A false dilemma in musculoskeletal MRI.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Temporal bone remodeling after venous stenting for pulsatile tinnitus: isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) offers a non-invasive method for large bowel assessment, proving useful for incomplete colonoscopies and as a radiation-free screening tool. Its high accuracy and patient acceptance make it a valuable diagnostic option.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) is increasingly used in clinical practice for large bowel evaluation.
  • It is particularly indicated for patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopies.
  • Virtual MRC is emerging as a screening tool due to its non-invasive nature and absence of ionizing radiation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) approaches.
  • To discuss indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes of MRC.
  • To explore the impact of fecal tagging on MRC procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) literature.
  • Analysis of established and emerging MRC techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of diagnostic accuracy, patient acceptance, and clinical outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • MRC is a validated tool for assessing the large bowel, especially when conventional colonoscopy fails.
    • Its non-invasive nature and lack of radiation are key advantages for screening.
    • High diagnostic accuracy and excellent patient acceptance are noted benefits.

    Conclusions:

    • Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) is a valuable diagnostic modality for large bowel assessment.
    • MRC presents significant advantages as a screening tool and for patients with incomplete colonoscopies.
    • Further research into fecal tagging concepts may enhance MRC efficacy.