Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

07:24
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
Published on: August 8, 2019
Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement
U Lindemann1, C Becker, I Unnewehr
1Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Stuttgart, Germany. ulrich.lindemann@rbk.de
Clinical Rehabilitation
|June 16, 2006
Summary
Patient-reported outcomes using the WOMAC questionnaire may not fully capture improvements in walking ability after total hip replacement. Objective gait analysis provides valuable, complementary data for assessing recovery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Total hip replacement (THR) aims to restore function and alleviate pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis.
- Assessing patient recovery involves both subjective self-reports and objective biomechanical measures.
- The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a common patient-reported outcome measure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between subjective patient evaluations (WOMAC) and objective gait analysis parameters following total hip replacement.
- To determine if the WOMAC questionnaire adequately reflects functional recovery in terms of walking performance.
Main Methods:
- A prospective preliminary trial conducted at a German academic orthopaedic centre.
- Seventeen patients undergoing primary unilateral total hip replacement for hip osteoarthritis were included.
- The WOMAC questionnaire and gait analysis were performed preoperatively and three months postoperatively.
Main Results:
- Significant improvements were observed in both subjective health status (WOMAC, P < 0.0001) and objective gait parameters including gait speed (P = 0.0222), stride length (P = 0.038), and stance phase ratio (P = 0.0466).
- The correlation between baseline gait parameters and WOMAC scores was poor (r ≤ -0.27).
- Correlation between the changes in gait parameters and WOMAC scores ranged from poor to good (r = 0.01 to -0.72).
Conclusions:
- The WOMAC questionnaire alone may not accurately reflect the objective improvements in walking performance after total hip replacement.
- Gait analysis provides essential objective data on gait quality that complements subjective patient reports.
- Integrating both subjective and objective measures is recommended for a comprehensive evaluation of THR outcomes.

