Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: methods.

Michael V Maciosek1, Nichol M Edwards, Ashley B Coffield

  • 1HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|June 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The glucose monitoring comparison in primary care study (GluCoCare): Study design, methods, recruitment success, and baseline characteristics of study participants.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

Primary care clinicians' perspectives on an electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2026
Same author

Predicted Cardiovascular and Economic Impacts of the Measure Accurately, Act Rapidly, and Partner With Patients Program to Improve Hypertension Control.

American journal of preventive medicine·2025
Same author

Projecting the impact of strengthened tobacco control policy on disparities in US states with persistently high smoking rates.

Tobacco induced diseases·2025
Same author

Design and protocol of a pragmatic clinical trial to improve cognitive impairment detection in primary care.

Contemporary clinical trials·2025
Same author

A learning health care community: integrating research and practice at scale.

The American journal of managed care·2025
Same journal

"The Real Cost" Campaign: Efficacy by Design.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

A Model for 21st Century Public Health Education: FDA's "The Real Cost" Youth Tobacco Prevention Campaigns.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Fathers' adverse childhood experiences and children's behavior problems.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Darknet cryptomarket listings for abortion medications after Dobbs.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Modeling the Impact of Combined Individual and Population-level National strategies for preventing type 2 diabetes.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Caregiving burden and health disparities: A nationwide study of 2,180 parents caring for children with developmental disabilities in South Korea.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study updates methods for ranking clinical preventive services based on health impact and economic value. It provides a new evidence-based framework for healthcare decision-makers to prioritize services effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Lack of established methods for prioritizing healthcare services based on impact and value.
  • Previous ranking of clinical preventive services published in 2001.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To update and refine methods for determining the relative health impact and economic value of clinical preventive services.
  • To provide a transparent and adaptable framework for evidence-based priority setting in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review and evidence collection for priority setting.
  • Development of standards for searching, tracking, and abstracting scientific literature.
  • Establishment of methods for valid comparisons across diverse preventive services.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • An updated methodology for assessing clinical preventive services is presented.
  • The methods facilitate evidence-based decision-making for healthcare resource allocation.
  • The report details the evidence collection and comparison techniques used.

Conclusions:

  • The updated methods offer a practical approach for identifying high-impact preventive services.
  • This framework supports informed decision-making for healthcare policy and practice.
  • The methodology is adaptable for various priority-setting initiatives in healthcare.