Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?

Isabel Gauthier1, Cindy Bukach

  • 1Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. isabel.gauthier@vanderbilt.edu

Cognition
|June 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial ability.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Using scene proximity judgments to study food-specific recognition ability.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Attention control contributes to ensemble perception regardless of selection demands.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Object recognition ability predicts episodic location memory, enhanced by meaningfulness.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Domain-general object recognition predicts human ability to tell real from AI-generated faces.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 50th anniversary special article series editorial.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Expertise in visual processing, particularly for faces, is supported by behavioral and neural evidence. This challenges claims that expertise does not influence configural processing of objects.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Expertise Studies

Background:

  • The debate on whether expertise influences visual configural processing, especially for faces versus non-face objects, remains polarized.
  • Robbins and McKone (2006) argued against an expertise account, citing limited evidence for differences in configural processing.
  • Methodological confusions in assessing configural processing, particularly within the composite paradigm, warrant clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify methodological issues in analyzing the composite paradigm for assessing configural and holistic effects.
  • To discuss theoretical aspects central to the face-specificity debate.
  • To review evidence supporting the link between behavioral expertise and neural markers of face selectivity.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critically reviewed existing literature on expertise and visual configural processing.
  • Analyzed methodological approaches, specifically the statistical analysis of the composite paradigm.
  • Synthesized behavioral and neural evidence correlating expertise with visual processing markers.

Main Results:

  • Positive evidence for expertise effects, encompassing both behavioral and neural data, significantly outweighs null results.
  • Clarified statistical analysis for the composite paradigm, crucial for assessing configural processing.
  • Demonstrated a correlation between measures of behavioral expertise and neural markers of face selectivity.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence supports the role of expertise in shaping visual configural processing, challenging claims of its absence.
  • The findings underscore the importance of experience in the specialization of visual cortex.
  • Future research should further explore the impact of expertise on visual perception and neural specialization.