Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interview, Dean's Letter, and Affective Domain Issues.

David Mallott1

  • 1Office of Medical Education, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. dmallott@clc.umaryland.edu

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|June 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Assessing medical students for residency involves evaluating non-academic factors like behavior and professionalism. These opaque elements, including interviews and Dean

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2010
Same author

The intersection of psychiatric diagnosis and inherited metabolic disease.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2009
Same author

An interactive, cognitive simulation of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2007
Same author

A basis for electronic cognitive simulation: the heuristic patient.

Surgical innovation·2005

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Residency Selection
  • Professionalism Assessment

Background:

  • Medical student evaluation includes academic records and less transparent assessments of behavior and professionalism.
  • Non-academic factors significantly influence residency program matching.
  • Current methods for assessing these non-academic variables lack systematic study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of non-academic factors in medical student residency selection.
  • To analyze the challenges in evaluating student behavior, character, and professionalism.
  • To identify methods for better assessing these crucial non-academic attributes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of non-academic evaluation components: interviews, Dean's Letters, and affective domain issues.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the difficulties in gathering and interpreting this information.
  • Exploration of the challenges in differentiating maturational behavior from psychopathology.

    • Main Results:

    • Non-academic factors are critical but difficult to systematically evaluate for residency matching.
    • Interviews and Dean's Letters provide insights but require careful interpretation.
    • Distinguishing normal maturation from psychopathology in student behavior is a significant challenge.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive assessment of medical students for residency requires careful consideration of non-academic factors.
    • Systematic approaches are needed to improve the evaluation of student behavior and professionalism.
    • Further research is essential to develop reliable methods for assessing these opaque but vital attributes.