Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Misperceptions in preparing for biological attack: an historical survey.

M Furmanski1

  • 1Arms Control Center Scientists' Working Group on Biological and Chemical Weapons, 1333 Beachmont Street, Ventura, CA 93001, USA.

Revue Scientifique Et Technique (International Office of Epizootics)
|June 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Preparing for biological attacks requires careful analysis of incomplete information. Historical errors in risk assessment and intervention often worsen the dangers they aim to prevent.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological warfare in the 1940s and 1950s.

JAMA·2000
Same author

Anthrax.

The New England journal of medicine·2000
Same author

Unlicensed vaccines and bioweapon defense in World War II.

JAMA·1999
Same author

Fatal hemolytic transfusion reaction resulting from ABO mistyping of a patient with acquired B antigen detectable only by some monoclonal anti-B reagents.

Transfusion·1996
Same author

Can intraductal breast carcinoma be excised completely by local excision? Clinical and pathologic predictors.

Cancer·1994
Same author

Duct carcinoma in situ: 227 cases without microinvasion.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·1992

Area of Science:

  • Biosecurity
  • Public Health Preparedness
  • Risk Analysis

Background:

  • Effective preparation for biological attacks necessitates integrating scientific, political, and social information.
  • Incomplete data is inherent in threat assessment, leading to potential errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a historical survey of significant errors in biological attack preparedness.
  • To identify common elements contributing to these errors.
  • To offer insights for avoiding future mistakes.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of past incidents related to biological attack preparedness.
  • Categorization of errors into risk misapprehensions, event misappraisals, and pre-emptive action misadventures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified three broad categories of errors: misapprehensions of risk, misappraisals of events, and misadventures in pre-emptive actions.
  • Found significant common elements across these error categories.

Conclusions:

  • Errors in biological attack preparedness are frequent and stem from common underlying issues.
  • These mistakes often exacerbate the very dangers they are intended to mitigate.
  • Understanding historical errors can inform improved future strategies for biosecurity.