Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.

A Meienbrock1, M J Naumer, O Doehrmann

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Department of Neurophysiology, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Neuropsychologia
|June 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accuracy of chat-based artificial intelligence for patient education on orthostatic hypotension.

Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society·2025
Same author

[Differentiating cochlear synaptopathies into different hearing disorders].

HNO·2019
Same author

Neurofeedback Training of Gamma Oscillations in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2019
Same author

Contextual modulation of primary visual cortex by auditory signals.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2017
Same author

Brain connectomics predict response to treatment in social anxiety disorder.

Molecular psychiatry·2015
Same author

Disturbances of gastrointestinal transit and autonomic functions in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2014
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Brain imaging reveals distinct neural networks for processing spatially aligned versus mismatched audio-visual stimuli. Higher visual and frontal areas process congruent signals, while earlier visual areas react to incongruent ones, suggesting feedback mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Sensory Integration

Background:

  • Successful integration of visual and auditory stimuli relies on spatial correspondence.
  • Audio-visual (AV) spatial congruency is crucial for multisensory perception.
  • Understanding neural processing of spatial AV information is key to sensory integration research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of processing spatially congruent versus incongruent audio-visual stimuli.
  • To identify distinct cortical networks involved in processing matched and mismatched AV spatial information.
  • To explore feedback mechanisms in sensory mismatch detection.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used in seven healthy human subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects assessed the spatial fit between visual stimuli (dog images) and auditory stimuli (barking sounds) presented at four horizontal locations.
  • Analysis focused on identifying brain regions differentially activated by congruent and incongruent AV stimuli, including retinotopic mapping.

    • Main Results:

    • Two distinct cortical networks emerged: one for congruent and one for incongruent AV stimuli.
    • Higher visual areas (temporal and parietal cortex) and frontal regions (PreCG, DLPFC) preferentially responded to congruent AV stimuli.
    • Earlier visual areas (V1, V2/V3 borders) showed preferential response to incongruent AV stimuli, particularly in the right hemisphere subregions, indicating a potential mismatch-related feedback.

    Conclusions:

    • Distinct neural pathways process spatially congruent and incongruent audio-visual information.
    • Higher-order visual and frontal cortices are involved in processing spatially aligned multisensory input.
    • Incongruent AV stimuli elicit feedback from multisensory regions to early visual areas, facilitating mismatch processing.