Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Asymptomatic diabetes: the difference between population-based and office-based screening.

Fabiola M S Adam1, John M F Adam, Nelson Pandeleki

  • 1Indonesian Christian University General Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty Hasanuddin University, Makassar.

Acta Medica Indonesiana
|June 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of knowledge, behavior and health application needs for cardiovascular disease prevention in young women: An interview and focus group discussion study in Makassar city.

Journal of education and health promotion·2026
Same author

Six-month clinical outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in eastern Indonesia: a prospective cohort study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The Correlation Between Angiotensin II Levels and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance in Normotensive Young Adults with a Family History of Essential Hypertension.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2025
Same author

Knowledge, Health Education, and Mobile Health Strategies on Cardiovascular Disease Awareness in Women: A Narrative Review.

Journal of mid-life health·2025
Same author

Low Attainment of Treatment Targets for Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Indonesian Adults With Established Coronary Artery Disease.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025
Same author

CYP2C19 polymorphism and coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

F1000Research·2024
Same journal

Mastery Learning in Intestinal Ultrasound Training: A Meaningful Step Forward, With Miles Still to Go.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2026
Same journal

The Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Questionnaire (PICSQ) for Intensive Care Unit Survivors.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2026
Same journal

Effects of Garcinia mangostana Peel Extract on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Human Studies.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2026
Same journal

Acromegaly in an Elderly Woman.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2026
Same journal

Current Situation and Global Perspective of Nipah Virus.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2026
Same journal

Cytomegalovirus Encephalitis and Cerebral Toxoplasmosis in an Immunocompetent Patient: A Rare Case Report.

Acta medica Indonesiana·2026
See all related articles

Office-based screening identifies more asymptomatic diabetes cases than population-based screening. Clinics are recommended for early detection of diabetes mellitus.

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern.
  • Early detection of asymptomatic diabetes is crucial for effective management and prevention of complications.
  • Comparing screening methodologies is essential for optimizing public health strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of population-based screening versus office-based screening for detecting diabetes mellitus.
  • To evaluate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus using different screening approaches.

Main Methods:

  • A population-based screening was conducted in Makassar Municipality, followed by office-based screening at a clinic.
  • Screening criteria included age, obesity, blood pressure, family history, and metabolic abnormalities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Diagnostic criteria varied: a single 2-hour post-load test for population screening and WHO 1999 criteria (fasting and 2-hour post-load) for office-based screening.

    • Main Results:

    • Population-based screening identified a diabetes prevalence of 5.42% (51 subjects).
    • Office-based screening identified a significantly higher prevalence of 17.1% (155 subjects).
    • Even using the same diagnostic criteria, office-based screening yielded a higher prevalence (7.7%) than population-based screening.

    Conclusions:

    • Office-based screening is more effective in detecting asymptomatic diabetes compared to population-based screening.
    • Clinical settings, such as hospitals or private practices, are recommended for early asymptomatic diabetes detection.
    • Targeted screening in clinical settings can improve early diagnosis rates.