Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modularity in cognition: framing the debate.

H Clark Barrett1, Robert Kurzban

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. barrett@anthro.ucla.edu

Psychological Review
|June 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends or crowds in independent and interdependent societies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Revisiting the human sociobiology debate<b>Sociobiology: The New Synthesis</b> <i>Edward O. Wilson</i> Harvard University Press, 1975. 697 pp.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Moralistic punishment is not for cooperation.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Climate change adaptation and the back of the invisible hand.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Lying about the future: Shuar-Achuar epistemic norms, predictions, and commitments.

Cognition·2023
Same author

How cultural framing can bias our beliefs about robots and artificial intelligence.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Modularity, a key concept in cognitive science, is often misunderstood. A clear definition of modularity can help resolve debates and guide research into the mind's structure.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Modularity has been debated in cognitive sciences for over 20 years.
  • Misunderstandings have hindered conceptual progress regarding mental architecture.
  • Previous arguments against modularity are often based on misinterpretations or abandoned positions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the concept of modularity in cognitive science.
  • To address and refute common arguments that undermine modularity.
  • To propose a refined framework for understanding cognitive systems and human cognition.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing arguments concerning modularity.
  • Analysis of critiques related to cognitive architecture, development, genetics, and evolution.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual clarification and redefinition of modularity.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified abandoned or misrepresented arguments against modularity.
    • Demonstrated that a clear definition of modularity is crucial for progress.
    • Highlighted the relevance of modularity across various scientific domains.

    Conclusions:

    • A precise definition of modularity offers a valuable framework for cognitive science research.
    • Modularity is a fundamental organizational principle in biology, applicable to the mind.
    • Resolving debates on modularity can advance our understanding of human cognition and its evolution.