Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Information processing capacity while wearing personal protective eyewear.

Chip Wade1, Jerry Davis, Thomas S Marzilli

  • 1Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreational Management, University of Mississippi, Mississippi 38677, USA. cwade@olemiss.edu

Ergonomics
|June 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Return to Duty Rates in Active-Duty Military: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Open Cervical Spine Surgery.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Training Load, Mileage, and Perceived Exertion as a Predictive Model of Injury and Illness in Women's Soccer.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Analysis of seat belt buckle release forces in post-rollover scenarios: Implications for passenger safety.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Inter-segmental coordination variability during hopping and running on natural and synthetic turf surfaces.

Sports biomechanics·2025
Same author

Video Analysis of Elite American Football Athletes During Vertical Jump.

Open access journal of sports medicine·2024
Same author

Unlatching school bus seat belt buckles: Considerations for young passengers.

Applied ergonomics·2024
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Personal protective eyewear may impact reaction times and postural control by affecting sensory information processing. Further research is needed to understand these effects on physiological and cognitive functions.

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Vision Science
  • Occupational Safety and Health

Background:

  • Vision is crucial for information processing and maintaining postural control.
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates personal protective eyewear (29 CFR 1910.133) for eye injury prevention.
  • The impact of this eyewear on cognitive and physiological functions is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of OSHA-regulated personal protective eyewear on physiological and cognitive factors related to information processing.
  • To assess how different eyewear conditions (control, new, aged) influence reaction times to visual and auditory stimuli.
  • To examine the interaction between support surface (inclined vs. horizontal) and eyewear on reaction time.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Twenty-one college students (ages 19-25) participated in the study.
  • Participants were tested under three eyewear conditions: control, new, and artificially aged.
  • Reaction times to 50 randomly presented auditory and visual stimuli were recorded over 10-minute trials on inclined and horizontal surfaces.

Main Results:

  • A significant interaction between support surface and eyewear condition was found for auditory stimulus reaction time (F2,40 = 7.4; p < 0.05).
  • Similarly, a significant surface by eyewear interaction affected visual stimulus reaction time (F2,40 = 21.7; p < 0.05).
  • These results indicate that eyewear type and surface angle influence sensory processing speed.

Conclusions:

  • While essential for eye protection, personal protective eyewear may have detrimental effects on sensory information processing.
  • The findings suggest potential negative impacts on cognitive and physiological aspects of postural control.
  • Further research is recommended to explore the biomechanical and sensory contributions to postural control when wearing protective eyewear.