Subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal insulin in the management of diabetics on CAPD: a review

Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous routes of administration for diabetics on CAPD were compared. The comparison included: (1) Control of blood glucose concentration: both methods can provide satisfactory glycemic control for most patients. Changing the method of insulin administration is warranted when one method fails. (2) Effect on plasma insulin levels: intraperitoneal administration can produce a plasma insulin profile similar to the normal profile. This is unusual with subcutaneous administration. Consequences of hyperinsulinemia (hyperlipidemia, hypertension) seem, however, to be similar between the two methods of insulin administration. (3) Effect on peritoneal permeability: permeability characteristics are maintained unchanged, usually, with either method after long-term CAPD. However, insulin is mitogenic in vitro. Theoretically, intraperitoneal insulin could lead to peritoneal fibrosis. (4) Effect on infectious complications of CAPD: a difference in the rate of peritonitis or overall PD catheter-related infections has not been convincingly demonstrated between the two methods of insulin administration. Exit site and tunnel infections with staphylococcus aureus may be more frequent in diabetics receiving insulin subcutaneously. (5) Effect on hepatic structure and function: subcapsular hepatic steatosis was described in diabetics receiving insulin intraperitoneally. The clinical significance of this finding remains to be demonstrated. We conclude that both methods can be applied for insulin administration in diabetics on CAPD. The intraperitoneal method should be tried first in most instances. Prospective studies comparing the two methods are needed.