Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
Published on: August 9, 2012
A meta-analysis comparing suprapubic and transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage after abdominal surgery
M J W McPhail1, M Abu-Hilal, C D Johnson
1University Surgical Unit, Mail Point 816, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Suprapubic catheterization is superior to transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage in general surgery patients. It reduces infection risks and improves patient comfort, making it a more acceptable option.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Innovation
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Bladder drainage is common in general surgery patients after laparotomy.
- Optimal catheterization method (suprapubic vs. transurethral) lacks consensus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare suprapubic and transurethral bladder drainage methods.
- To evaluate patient satisfaction, bacteriuria, and recatheterization rates.
Main Methods:
- Systematic database search for suprapubic catheterization studies.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials.
- Meta-analysis of bacteriuria, patient satisfaction, and recatheterization rates.
Main Results:
- Transurethral catheterization showed significantly higher rates of bacteriuria (RR=2.02) and discomfort (RR=2.94).
- Recatheterization rates did not differ significantly between methods (RR=1.97).
Conclusions:
- Suprapubic bladder drainage is more patient-acceptable.
- Suprapubic catheterization reduces microbiological morbidity in general surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

