Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

11:17
Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
Published on: August 24, 2012
Time-dependent changes in conditioned suppression
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|March 1, 1978
Summary
Pigeons showed a U-shaped function in conditioned suppression, with peak responses at intermediate retention intervals after aversive conditioning. This pattern was most prominent in forward-pairing groups, indicating time-dependent memory effects.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral neuroscience
- Animal behavior
- Learning and memory
Background:
- Aversive conditioning is a fundamental learning process.
- Understanding temporal dynamics of learned responses is crucial.
- Pavlovian and operant conditioning interactions are complex.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate time-dependent changes in conditioned suppression.
- To examine the effect of retention interval on response suppression.
- To compare different conditioning procedures (forward, backward, random pairing).
Main Methods:
- Within-subjects design using pigeons.
- Conditioned suppression procedure with Pavlovian (tone-shock) and operant (key pecking) phases.
- Variable retention intervals (0-60 minutes) between conditioning and testing.
Main Results:
- A U-shaped function was observed for conditioned suppression across retention intervals.
- Maximum suppression occurred at intermediate intervals for forward-pairing groups.
- Backward-pairing groups did not show significant changes in suppression over time.
Conclusions:
- Learned suppression is time-dependent, with optimal memory recall at intermediate intervals.
- Forward conditioning is more susceptible to temporal decay effects than backward conditioning.
- Retention interval significantly modulates the expression of conditioned fear responses.
Related Concept Videos
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
Tachyphylaxis is described as a rapid decrease in response to a drug after repeated or continuous administration of the same drug dose. It is a phenomenon where the body becomes less responsive to a particular substance or intervention over time, requiring higher doses or stronger interventions to achieve the same effect. It results from adaptive changes in the body's receptors, signaling pathways, or physiological processes that occur in response to prolonged exposure to a stimulus.
Several...
Several...
Principles of Classical Conditioning
Classical conditioning, as described by Ivan Pavlov, is a foundational concept in associative learning, where a neutral stimulus becomes capable of eliciting a conditioned response through association with an unconditioned stimulus. The process of acquisition, where this learning occurs, and the subsequent phenomena of contiguity, contingency, generalization, discrimination, extinction, and spontaneous recovery are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of classical conditioning.
During the...
During the...
Classical Conditioning in Daily Life
Classical conditioning, a fundamental principle of associative learning, explains various phenomena observed in daily life, such as fear development, the placebo effect, taste aversion, and drug habituation. These applications demonstrate the profound impact of associative learning on human behavior and physiological responses.
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

