Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Session duration and the VI response function: Within-session prospective and retrospective effects.

J D Dougan, J A Kuh, K L Vink

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |November 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Simple and multiple schedule responding and behavioral contrast when pigeons press treadles.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Reinforcement in the sixteenth century: Was the bard a behaviorist?

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Total duration weighted by frequency: A meaningful measure?

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Within-session changes in the VI response function: separating food density from elapsed session time.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·1995
    Same author

    Temporal regulation by estrogen of beta-preprotachykinin mRNA expression in the rat ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus.

    Brain research. Molecular brain research·1995
    Same author

    Site-specific effects of intracerebral injections of three neurokinins (neurokinin A, neurokinin K, and neurokinin gamma) on the expression of male rat sexual behavior.

    Physiology & behavior·1993

    Session duration significantly impacts animal behavior on variable-interval schedules. Longer sessions reveal complex response patterns influenced by both future and past events, unlike shorter sessions.

    Area of Science:

    • Behavioral Psychology
    • Animal Behavior Studies
    • Operant Conditioning

    Background:

    • Variable-interval (VI) schedules are fundamental in operant conditioning.
    • Previous research has debated the form of the VI response function.
    • The influence of session duration on VI responding requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate how session duration affects response rates under simple variable-interval schedules.
    • To explore the underlying behavioral processes (prospective and retrospective) that contribute to observed response patterns.
    • To clarify the controversy surrounding the shape of the variable-interval response function.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted using rats as subjects.
    • Experiment 1 involved exposure to various session durations (10 min, 30 min) and reinforcement rates.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 used a discrimination procedure where pellet flavor signaled session duration.

    • Main Results:

    • Response rate functions were monotonic in short (10-min) sessions but bitonic in long (30-min) sessions.
    • Analysis within sessions indicated the involvement of both prospective and retrospective behavioral processes.
    • Rats adjusted their responding based on predicted session duration, responding faster in shorter sessions.

    Conclusions:

    • Session duration is a critical variable influencing responding on variable-interval schedules.
    • Both prospective and retrospective processes operate simultaneously, shaping behavior over time.
    • The findings contribute to understanding the variable-interval response function and the complexities of reinforcement schedules.