Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

08:46
Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis
Kutluk Oktay1, Aylin Pelin Cil, Heejung Bang
1Fertility Preservation Program at Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, New York, New York, USA. kuo9001@med.cornell.edu
Fertility and Sterility
|July 5, 2006
Summary
Oocyte cryopreservation using slow-freezing (SF) shows lower in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates compared to unfrozen oocytes. While SF may be suitable for medical fertility preservation, its elective use requires further evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Embryology
- In Vitro Fertilization
Background:
- Oocyte cryopreservation is a key technique in assisted reproductive technologies.
- Comparing the efficacy of cryopreserved oocytes versus fresh oocytes in IVF is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation, specifically slow-freezing (SF), in comparison to in vitro fertilization (IVF) using unfrozen oocytes.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was conducted comparing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using cryopreserved oocytes (1996-2004) with those using unfrozen oocytes (2002-2003).
- Slow-freezing (SF) protocols were analyzed, while vitrification (VF) data was limited due to low pregnancy rates before June 2005.
- Key outcome measures included fertilization rates, clinical pregnancy rates, live-birth rates, and implantation rates.
Main Results:
- Live-birth rates per thawed oocyte were 1.9% for SF and 2.0% for VF (pre-June 2005).
- IVF with unfrozen oocytes demonstrated significantly higher rates of fertilization (OR 2.22), live birth per injected oocyte (OR 1.5), and implantation (OR 4.66) compared to SF.
- Improved pregnancy rates were observed with VF after June 2005, suggesting advancements in the technique.
Conclusions:
- In vitro fertilization success rates are significantly lower with slow-frozen (SF) oocytes compared to unfrozen oocytes.
- Oocyte cryopreservation via SF is justified for medical fertility preservation but its elective application needs further study.
- While vitrification (VF) shows promise with improved pregnancy rates, further research is necessary to confirm its efficiency and safety.
