Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?

Zvi Fireman1

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Hillel-Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel. fireman@hy.health.gov.il

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ensure preparation and capsule endoscopy: a two-center prospective study.

World journal of gastroenterology·2013
Same author

Vitamin D supplementation improves sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1)-naïve patients.

World journal of gastroenterology·2012
Same author

Macroamylasemia as the first manifestation of celiac disease.

Case reports in gastroenterology·2011
Same author

Capsule endoscopy: Future horizons.

World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy·2010
Same author

Post-pyloric feeding.

World journal of gastroenterology·2009
Same author

Induced sputum eosinophilia in ulcerative colitis patients: the lung as a mirror image of intestine?

Respiratory medicine·2009
Same journal

Patient-Level Predictors of Procedural Success in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
Same journal

Preventive Effect of Helicobacter pylori Treatment on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
Same journal

Toward the Era of Precision Immunotherapy: The Clinical Landscape and Future Directions of mRNA Vaccines for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
Same journal

From Chronic Atrophic Gastritis to Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Proteomic Study on the Sequential Progression of Gastric Precancerous Lesions.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
Same journal

Resource-Stratified Carbon-Adjusted Quality Indicators for Green Endoscopy.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
Same journal

Five-Year Outcomes and Disease Trajectories in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Korean Multicenter Inception Cohort.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
See all related articles

Both reusable and disposable biopsy forceps are available, but reusable options offer better cost-effectiveness and comparable safety after sterilization. Disposable forceps present risks of damage during reprocessing and higher long-term costs.

Area of Science:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Medical Device Sterilization
  • Healthcare Economics

Background:

  • Biopsy forceps are essential tools in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
  • Both reusable and disposable types are prevalent, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages.
  • The trend has shifted towards disposable devices globally, citing infection control benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps.
  • To evaluate the impact of sterilization and reprocessing on reusable and disposable endoscopic accessories.
  • To analyze the risks associated with cross-contamination and device integrity in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of reusable and disposable biopsy forceps.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of sterilization and reprocessing protocols for reusable devices.
  • Assessment of cost-effectiveness over a designated number of procedures.
  • Review of potential risks of infectious disease transmission and device damage.

    • Main Results:

    • Reusable biopsy forceps can be cost-effective over multiple procedures compared to single-use disposable forceps.
    • Concerns for reusable devices include maintaining sterility and functional integrity post-sterilization.
    • Reprocessing disposable forceps may lead to device damage, while their single-use nature eliminates reprocessing concerns but increases overall cost.

    Conclusions:

    • Reusable biopsy forceps can be a safe, effective, and more economical choice for gastrointestinal endoscopy units.
    • Careful consideration of sterilization efficacy and device durability is crucial for reusable accessories.
    • While disposable forceps reduce cross-contamination risks, their cost and potential for reprocessing damage warrant careful evaluation.