Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selecting specialist registrars by station interview.

P E M Smith1, F D Dunstan, C M Wiles

  • 1South Wales Neurology Rotation. SmithPE@cardiff.ac.uk

Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shared decision-making in epilepsy management.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2015
Same author

Identifying and prioritising epilepsy treatment uncertainties.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2010
Same author

Awake seizures after pure sleep-related epilepsy: a systematic review and implications for driving law.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2010
Same author

Epilepsy genetics: clinical beginnings and social consequences.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2009
Same author

Real-life step and activity measurement: reliability and validity.

Journal of medical engineering & technology·2009
Same author

Mobility and falls in people with Huntington's disease.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2008
Same journal

Letter to the Editor: 'Life expectancy of UK physicians in the early 21st century: An analysis of 1,000 fellows from the Royal College of Physicians' Munk's Roll'.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Finerenone Exposure and Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and predictive factors of chronic kidney disease among individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors: A multicenter cross sectional study, North East Ethiopia.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Authors' response to Dr Lucy Williams' letter to the Editor: 'Life expectancy of UK physicians in the early 21st century: An analysis of 1,000 fellows from the Royal College of Physicians' Munk's Roll'.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Resident doctor workforce wellbeing worldwide: lessons between the United Kingdom and Australia.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Premature ventricular complexes.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Station interviews offer a fairer method for selecting medical trainees, assessing key competencies beyond traditional panel interviews. This competency-based approach improves the assessment of specialist registrar candidates.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Neurology Training

Background:

  • Specialist registrar (SpR) appointments heavily rely on interview performance.
  • Traditional panel interviews often fail to assess essential medical trainee competencies.
  • There is a need for more effective selection methods in medical training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of station interviews for selecting neurology SpRs.
  • To compare the performance of station interviews with traditional CV-based interviews.
  • To determine if station interviews provide a fairer and more accurate assessment of candidate competencies.

Main Methods:

  • Eighteen neurology SpR candidates were assessed using a station interview format.
  • Interviews comprised three stations: CV-based, simulated patient interaction, and scenario discussion (teaching, audit, research).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Candidates were ranked independently by assessors at each station, followed by pooled rankings and reference review.

    • Main Results:

    • Station interviews, particularly those assessing research and information giving, showed higher correlations with overall rankings than CV-based interviews.
    • Research station (r=0.83) and information giving (r=0.75) demonstrated strong predictive validity.
    • CV-based interviews, similar to traditional methods, had a lower correlation (r=0.54) with overall rankings.

    Conclusions:

    • Station interviews provide a fairer and potentially more accurate method for selecting medical trainees.
    • Competency-based assessments, like station interviews, should be more widely adopted in medical training selection.
    • This approach enhances the assessment of critical skills required for specialist registrars.