Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Synaptic mechanisms underlying auditory processing.

Anne-Marie M Oswald1, Max L Schiff, Alex D Reyes

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003, USA. oswald@cns.nyu.edu

Current Opinion in Neurobiology
|July 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computing the effects of excitatory-inhibitory balance on neuronal input-output properties.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Interleaving asynchronous and synchronous activity in balanced cortical networks with short term synaptic depression.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Interleaving asynchronous and synchronous activity in balanced cortical networks with short-term synaptic depression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Disinhibitory Circuitry Gates Associative Synaptic Plasticity in Olfactory Cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2022
Same author

Mathematical framework for place coding in the auditory system.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Curating more diverse scientific conferences.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2020
Same journal

Population codes for context-dependent decision-making.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Cichlid fish as a model for understanding social dysfunction.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

On aims and methods in field neuroethology: Investigating neural mechanisms of behavior in semi-natural and natural contexts.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Neurobiological interfaces connecting environmental change to monarch butterfly migration.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Learning how to experience the world: From circuits to cell types to genes.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Editorial overview for neurobiology of disease 2026.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
See all related articles

New in vivo voltage clamp recordings reveal auditory cortex processing. Excitatory and inhibitory inputs share tuning, with brief inhibition following excitation, challenging current auditory processing models.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • The primary auditory cortex (A1) is crucial for processing complex sounds.
  • Understanding synaptic mechanisms in A1 is key to deciphering auditory perception.
  • Existing models often rely on lateral inhibition for receptive field shaping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate synaptic mechanisms in the primary auditory cortex using in vivo voltage clamp.
  • To characterize the frequency and intensity tuning of excitatory and inhibitory inputs.
  • To explore the temporal dynamics of excitation-inhibition interactions and their impact on neural responses.

Main Methods:

  • In vivo voltage clamp recordings in the primary auditory cortex.
  • Analysis of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Characterization of frequency and intensity tuning properties of synaptic inputs.
  • Investigation of the temporal relationship between excitation and inhibition.

    • Main Results:

    • Excitatory and inhibitory inputs in A1 exhibit similar frequency and intensity tuning.
    • Inhibition follows excitation with a short, consistent delay.
    • The duration of inhibitory events is shorter than previously anticipated.
    • These findings challenge the role of broadly tuned lateral inhibition in shaping receptive fields.

    Conclusions:

    • Synaptic processing in the auditory cortex is shaped by precisely timed excitation-inhibition interactions.
    • The brief duration of inhibition suggests active mechanisms for its termination.
    • Short-term plasticity and inhibition play critical roles in shaping neural responses beyond simple receptive field limitation.
    • New models are needed to incorporate these dynamic inhibitory processes in auditory processing.