Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

09:37
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities
Scott Sinnett1, Albert Costa, Salvador Soto-Faraco
1GRNC, Parc Científic, Universitat de Barcelona & Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Spain. ssoto@ub.edu
Summary
Inattentional blindness (IB) occurs when people miss visible events outside their focus. This study found IB is less common when attention is divided across senses compared to within a single sense, suggesting shared attention resources.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Attention Studies
Background:
- Inattentional blindness (IB) describes the failure to consciously perceive events outside the focus of attention.
- Previous research primarily examined IB within a single sensory modality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate inattentional blindness for words presented within and across sensory modalities (visual and auditory).
- To determine if dividing attention across different senses has the same consequences as dividing attention within a single sensory modality.
Main Methods:
- Participants monitored rapid streams of pictures or sounds concurrently with task-irrelevant spoken or written words.
- A word recognition test measured processing of unattended words compared to explicitly monitored words.
- Experiments manipulated unimodal and crossmodal attention conditions.
Main Results:
- High levels of inattentional blindness were observed for both visually and auditorily presented words in unimodal conditions.
- IB was also produced under crossmodal conditions.
- However, inattentional blindness was less prevalent when attention was divided across sensory modalities compared to within a single modality.
Conclusions:
- Findings support the attentional load hypothesis.
- Attention resources appear to be shared, to some extent, across sensory modalities.
- Dividing attention across senses may be less disruptive than dividing it within a single sense.

