Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Reconnecting interpretation to reasoning through individual differences.

Keith Stenning¹, Richard Cox

¹Edinburgh University, Scotland, UK. k.stenning@ed.ac.uk

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)

|July 19, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Improving Immunization Rates Through Community-Based Participatory Research: Community Health Improvement for Milwaukee's Children Program.

Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action·2016

Same author

Reasoning, logic, and psychology.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2015

Same author

The empirical study of norms is just what we are missing.

Frontiers in psychology·2014

Same author

Calculating alcohol risk in a visualization tool for promoting healthy behavior.

Patient education and counseling·2013

Same author

QSAR workbench: automating QSAR modeling to drive compound design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2013

Same author

To naturalize or not to naturalize? An issue for cognitive science as well as anthropology.

Topics in cognitive science·2012

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

This study reveals that how people interpret information in reasoning tasks depends on context. Understanding these interpretation patterns is key to explaining differences in deductive reasoning performance.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Psychology
Linguistics

Background:

Computational theories of mind posit information interpretation precedes reasoning.
Previous research indicated differing interpretations of premises in immediate vs. syllogistic reasoning tasks.
Gricean implicatures alone have not reconciled these interpretation differences.

Purpose of the Study:

To reconcile differing interpretations of premises in deductive reasoning tasks.
To explore how credulous discourse processing and information packaging influence interpretation.
To investigate the continuity of interpretation across immediate and syllogistic reasoning.

Main Methods:

Exploratory experimental design.
Investigated immediate inference and subsequent syllogistic reasoning tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

Analyzed interpretation patterns based on credulity and reliance on information packaging.

Main Results:

Systematic interpretation patterns were identified, driven by credulity and information packaging.
These patterns transcended specific quantifier inferences.
Interpretation differences directly influenced subsequent syllogistic reasoning outcomes.

Conclusions:

Participants' understanding of deductive tasks often diverges from experimental intentions.
Continuity of interpretation is achievable through a broad Gricean framework of credulous discourse processing.
Human reasoning is not monolithic; expect variety rather than a single fundamental mechanism.